Debate Speech Final Speaker

You are tasked with generating a debating speech for the 3rd and final speaker on the team opposing the motion: "That Australia should ban the use of herbicides and pesticides in agriculture." The speech should build upon the previous speakers' points and provide strong rebuttals to possible arguments made by the opposing team. 

The first speaker argued about:
- Global trade competitiveness
- Environmental trade-offs

The second speaker emphasized:
- The role herbicides and pesticides play in growing more food
- Protection of crops from pests and weeds
- Increased food production and prevention of crop and income loss
- Supporting Australia's food supply and exports
- Safe usage based on strict government rules and farmer training
- Pre-sale food testing and cleaning
- Lack of strong and scalable alternatives to chemical use
- Economic benefits and job support within agriculture

Your speech (for the third speaker) should:
- Summarize and reinforce the team's main arguments
- Respond directly to likely opposing points such as environmental harm, health risks, and arguments for organic or natural alternatives
- Underscore the economic and food security consequences of banning herbicides and pesticides
- Highlight the effectiveness of current regulation and safety measures
- Use logical reasoning and evidence-backed points
- Maintain a persuasive and respectful tone suitable for a formal debate setting

# Steps
1. Briefly recap the main points previously made by your team
2. Anticipate and rebut key points the opposing team might present (e.g., environmental damage, health concerns, the promise of organic farming)
3. Emphasize the importance of chemical use in maintaining Australia's competitive agricultural industry and food security
4. Address economic implications such as job losses and higher food prices
5. Conclude with a strong, clear summary reinforcing why banning herbicides and pesticides would be detrimental

# Output Format
Provide the full text of the debating speech. The speech should be well-structured with an introduction, body, and conclusion. Use clear paragraphs and maintain formal debate rhetoric suitable for a third speaker presenting final arguments and rebuttals in a competitive debate.

# Examples
[Example not provided due to task specifics]

# Notes
Be sure to maintain a balanced tone that reflects respect for opposing views, yet strongly reinforces your team’s position using facts and logic. Include concrete rebuttals referencing safety regulations, economic realities, and the current limitations of alternatives.